With the subject line in view, I'm going to talk about a decision that has caused my internal guilt monitor to spike off the charts.

Since I started work again and Keiki began going to nursery two and a half months ago, the nursery staff have been attempting to bottle-feed him twice a day. It has been a mostly unsuccessful endeavour. He vigorously rejected bottles with teats. He relented toward sippy cups for a while, though he was still not enthusiastic about taking breast milk or formula from either. When I started overnighting once a week in London (my usual full-time routine) in September, he would occasionally drink 100 mL (3.5 ounces) on the second day I was away. But he seems to have figured out that I return on the evening of the second day, and he's quite happy to go on milk strike until the warm fleshy milk-production unit comes back.

He rejected his two daily nursery bottle feeds for two weeks in a row, so this week we chose to stop asking the nursery to give them to him. The reason for the guilt? He's ten months old, and according to The Literature, he's still supposed to be getting 500 mL of milk (breast or formula) a day until he's one. I estimate, from when I'm away and have to pump to keep the boobs from 'sploding, that he gets at most 100 mL per feed from me. Even with one feed in the morning, one at bedtime and one or two at night, that's still not 500 mL, and obviously he doesn't get anywhere near that when I'm away for a day and a half.

He eats all the solid food that's offered to him, and even some that's not. Yesterday he stole his sister's half-eaten cupcake. Last week, Keiki's key worker was highly amused when they set out biscuits for the babies to decorate with icing and chocolate buttons. They turned their backs for a few seconds. When they turned round again, four babies were sitting nicely with two undecorated biscuits apiece in front of them. One baby had half a biscuit clutched in his hand and a lot of crumbs around his mouth. (You get one guess which baby that was.) This was right after lunch. So I don't think there's anything wrong with his appetite, and he certainly seems to be getting enough to eat. I really shouldn't be worried, but what with all the unconsciously absorbed socially imposed guilt surrounding being a working mother and being away from my little ones and that annoying mystically calculated 500 mL amount that we're not achieving, I have to expend a considerable amount of emotional energy talking myself into remaining calm.

He's fine. He's fine! He's a happy, healthy baby. He just prefers boob or food to anything that comes out of a bottle. I should stop stressing, y/y?
cmcmck: (Default)

From: [personal profile] cmcmck


But it is surely not possible to assume that all these little individuals are exactly the same?

I have a huge dislike of one size fits all policies!

As you say, he's a happy, healthy baby.........
perennialanna: Plum Blossom (Default)

From: [personal profile] perennialanna


Is he old enough for vitamin drops? Actually, he must be, I'm fairly sure breastfed babies who don't get any formula are meant to have vitamin drops from six months (it's entirely possible that advice has changed in the three years since I had a six month old baby. Who was fairly soon to go on a five month long nursing strike in daylight hours, before returning gleefully to the boob at 14 months old. Babies are weird). Multivitamins are a great soother of the maternal mind, whatever they do or don't do for the child.
highlyeccentric: Sign on Little Queen St - One Way both directions (Default)

From: [personal profile] highlyeccentric


I second this recommendation! Little bro's doctor had some trouble convincing my mother into providing him with vitamins. In his teens - he was ill, had super weird eating habits that turned out to be pre-eating-disorder, and clearly wasn't obtaining sufficient nutrition from his regular diet. Mum took this as a sign of her FAILURE TO NOURISH etc. No idea if they did him much good in the long run, but I think they bought all parties six months or so de-stressing on the 'what is the child going to eat today???' front.
perennialanna: Plum Blossom (Default)

From: [personal profile] perennialanna


My mother was a nurse before having children, and she was very keen on multivitamins when we were having various eating dramas. Parental calmness is fairly key to getting things back on track, and it's an awful lot easier when you know they're getting their basic needs (I've had my own dramas over the summer, with a three year old who reacted badly to his father walking out one dinner time and took months to be reconciled to eating a range of food at the table rather than toast on the sofa. Giving him vitamins got me through it).
yvi: Kaylee half-smiling, looking very pretty (Default)

From: [personal profile] yvi


And 200 mg of caffeine is supposed to be the maximum that is safe during pregnancy - only there's no study in the world saying that. I think they sometimes just pull these numbers from thin air.
pbristow: Paul looks straight into camera, chin in hand, eyebrow raised. He is shaggy haired, boss-eyed, & his glasses are askew. (_Boss-eyed)

From: [personal profile] pbristow


How very dare you! The thickness of the air from which they pull their numbers has been certified to be *well* over the recommended minimum...

=;o}
nou: The word "kake" in a white monospaced font on a black background (Default)

From: [personal profile] nou


He's fine! He's healthy and happy and eating plenty of food. The NHS advice is (for good reasons) over-simplified and over-generalised.
fred_mouse: line drawing of sheep coloured in queer flag colours with dream bubble reading 'dreamwidth' (Default)

From: [personal profile] fred_mouse


Is it likely that the advice is generalised for people with low access to a range of healthy foods? The comment upthread that that 500 mL offers the necessary vitamins would imply that there aren't vitamins coming in from other areas.
recessional: a photo image of feet in sparkly red shoes (Default)

From: [personal profile] recessional


Ish.

Official health bodies write advice with a particular person in mind - to whit, a young parent of baseline education with no support network, no experience with babies, and very basic income. Everyone MAY turn to Official Advice for help, but those are the people who have no other CHOICE. And it's written with as much redundancy as possible, with the aim of the healthiest baby possible, assuming that that young, under-educated solo parent is going to have to end up cutting a corner or two just because of Life.

(nb: my mother, in her Medical Director range roles, helps set up some of these official publications, so. When I once asked her about it because I found the tone of the official literature so . . . odd, she very bluntly said, "These aren't for you. You have a vast network of relatives with children, several of whom are healthcare professionals, all of whom care deeply, and all of whom will answer calls in the middle of the night, plus you know HOW to access adequate paediatric care. This is for the seventeen year old who has none of that." As she said, they're still quite USEFUL, but they're aimed at the absolute beginner, and the beginner with very low resources to boot.)
fred_mouse: line drawing of sheep coloured in queer flag colours with dream bubble reading 'dreamwidth' (Default)

From: [personal profile] fred_mouse


That makes a lot of sense - thank you for clarifying.
recessional: a photo image of feet in sparkly red shoes (Default)

From: [personal profile] recessional


This. It's like the "you MUST sanitize the bottles!" - which advice is based on the assumption that they are not being VIGOROUSLY SCRUBBED in very warm soapy water until absolutely all trace of milk is gone and then air-dried.

Because you can't assume that, but if you insist everybody boils them for ten minutes on a regular basis, it doesn't matter if the cleaning isn't Perfect, because the relevant microbes have been killed off anyway. Same with the other stuff.

From: [personal profile] magister


Pretty much this. Babies aren't really ones to suffer in silence - were there anything wrong, he'd be letting you know about it.
fred_mouse: line drawing of sheep coloured in queer flag colours with dream bubble reading 'dreamwidth' (Default)

From: [personal profile] fred_mouse


500ml? ...I have never seen that advice. Interesting how different countries do different things! I don't think I've really even seen advice that if formula feeding, one should go to/past a particular time point (other than that complementary foods shouldn't start before 6 months, or if you have an old fashioned health nurse, before 4 months).

with my researchers hat on: what you get when pumping, and what the baby takes can be quite different. Very little is known about why the ratio of at the breast vs at the pump varies, and one of the researchers I work with is trying to work out what can be done better with pumps to improve.

with my parent hat on: at seven months, middle child flat out refused to take any liquid from a bottle. So, feed at daycare before I went off to work, feed at daycare when I collected zer, bedtime, however many night feeds. There were no negative effects. This child (now teen) would eat pretty much anything anywhere. And zie was a happy child.

tl; dr - yes, you should stop stressing. Baby is getting enough, or would be complaining.
fred_mouse: line drawing of sheep coloured in queer flag colours with dream bubble reading 'dreamwidth' (Default)

From: [personal profile] fred_mouse

further on this


have gone and talked to co-worker, and discovered that there is no published study that compares the amount of available milk taken by baby with the amount of available milk that is typically expressed, within individuals. There are studies that look at amount taken by the baby (average 67%, sorry, no SDs or measures of within/between participant variation), and pumping under various conditions (between 60 and 65%, again, no useful information there).

[it has gone on the list of things that we might get around to doing, one of these days. I'll put it on my list of possible work place projects....]
fred_mouse: line drawing of sheep coloured in queer flag colours with dream bubble reading 'dreamwidth' (Default)

From: [personal profile] fred_mouse

Re: further on this


so, the way to measure the milk intake (and indirectly, the parent's milk production) is called test weighing. It requires scales that can reliably give a weight of the baby to a fine scale (ours are closest 2g for infants up to ~5kg, and closest 5 g up to something like 10kg). Baby is weighed before a feed, and then at the end of a feed, with no changes to clothing.

One thing though - we've been looking at perceptions of inadequate production, and what we've seen in our most recent cohort is that people who reported concerns about production, and test weighed for every feed over 24 hours (+ 1 feed) - something like a 1/3 of these have really good milk productions (I'll have to look up the study, and send you the link, if you are interested).

And yes - we would love to know more about what works and what doesn't for milk supply. There are not enough researchers in the field, and bugger all funding. Which is frustrating for something that has long term health ramifications, and as a result is really expensive at the aggregate level.
purplecat: Hand Drawn picture of a Toy Cat (Default)

From: [personal profile] purplecat


He's fine. He's fine! He's a happy, healthy baby. He just prefers boob or food to anything that comes out of a bottle.

So yes, you should stop stressing.

Though it if is of any help, does he like yoghurts? or those baby fromage frais things? or cheese? - all ways to sneak extra dairy into his diet under the guise of solid food.
recessional: a photo image of feet in sparkly red shoes (Default)

From: [personal profile] recessional


I've known totally happy, healthy babies who were completely weaned or onto cow milk by 10 months. It's fine. He's gleefully eating all kinds of solid food, and probably nursing at least as much for Connection To Mum as for anything else, so bottles are a SERIOUSLY poor substitute.
forthwritten: (escher's cat)

From: [personal profile] forthwritten


There's also the chance he's watching whatever Humuhumu does with great interest and what she's eating looks much more exciting than a bottle. My younger sister did a lot of things ridiculously early because she was attempting to copy me (who was nearly 2.5 years older).

ETA: and happening at nursery because he may rank it as

1) breast milk (not least for the connection with you)
2) Food
3) Bottle

If breast milk isn't on offer but food is available, why bother with the bottle?
Edited Date: 2015-10-20 10:36 pm (UTC)
recessional: a photo image of feet in sparkly red shoes (Default)

From: [personal profile] recessional


Good call. I have also seen the copying at work, tho that baby was bottle fed from early on.
antisoppist: (nah)

From: [personal profile] antisoppist


I've never heard of 500ml anywhere but perhaps they weren't saying it between 2000 and 2007, in which case, pretend you're me and ignore it. Also your baby is a much more efficient milk extracting unit than a breast pump and your breasts are geared up to producing instantly what your baby wants (like leaking madly when you hear a random baby cry on a train, or was that just me...?) and have also probably now adapted a bit to not being required on day 1 but required more on day 2, so what you're getting from a breast pump when you're not with him might bear no relation to how much he's getting when you're back together. My dad says it's like dairy cows. When you go to three times a day milking from two times a day, they produce milk on day one because they think their calves need it (I had some peculiar bonding conversations with my farmer father while breastfeeding, including the fact that oats boost milk production in cows as well as humans).

Mine refused milk in any receptacle at nursery and stubbornly held out until it was provided in its proper form, i.e. me, mostly all night. The nursery gave them water in sippy cups and biscuit/rusk things with vitamins in, apples, bananas, yoghurts...

And advice changes. With my first, she wasn't supposed to be on solids until 4 months but with my second the advice was 6 months. However he grabbed a gingerbread man off the table on Christmas Eve and sucked its head off aged 4 months and four days so we decided to start feeding in the baby rice from then on.

Tldr: Don't worry.
rmc28: Rachel in hockey gear on the frozen fen at Upware, near Cambridge (Default)

From: [personal profile] rmc28


leaking madly when you hear a random baby cry on a train, or was that just me

It wasn't just you ...
hilarita: stoat hiding under a log (Default)

From: [personal profile] hilarita


I think you're allowed to call it 'child-led weaning' to draw attention to the fact that you're doing what Keiki wants, rather than forcing him to take food/drink against his will in order to meet some arbitrary number.
highlyeccentric: Sign on Little Queen St - One Way both directions (Default)

From: [personal profile] highlyeccentric


oooh yes, this sounds like an excellent justification!
recessional: a photo image of feet in sparkly red shoes (Default)

From: [personal profile] recessional


I knew there was a term for it I was forgetting.
rmc28: Rachel in hockey gear on the frozen fen at Upware, near Cambridge (Default)

From: [personal profile] rmc28


To add my 2p to everyone else: he's fine, he's cheerful, he's expressing his preferences and you're responding to them, he has plenty of food as well as the days he gets your milk. It's all good.

As someone who both fed and pumped, I don't think what you get out pumping is what baby takes feeding, if nothing else based on the way I was usually less hungry after pumping sessions than feeds.

(also also I got really fed up of pumping, especially second time around, and was really pleased to be able to arrange things so as to minimise it; so part of my reaction is yay! less pumping! go you!)

That is a cracking story about the biscuits. Go Keiki!
ed_rex: (Default)

From: [personal profile] ed_rex

Oi


Disclaimer: I'm male and I've not yet been a father.

But I feel compelled to note that it kind of amazes me this is even an issue.

Isn't it obvious that (a) all else being equal, breast-feeding ('till the child is weaned and/or weans itself) is better than any sort of formula and (b) that nothing is equal, ever?

For whatever it's worth, I'm told that I, for reasons I no longer recall, made my own mother's life easy by rejecting the breast at around the age of 6 months. And I like to think the lack of the real deal hasn't done me too much harm.

Dare I suggest you follow Dr. Spock's advice (I paraphrase, based on what me old mum remembers of her reading) and follow your own instincts as to what's best in your own circumstances?
ed_rex: (Default)

From: [personal profile] ed_rex

Re: Oi


Just doing my bit for positive reinforcement! And to that end, I'll quote your own words back at you: "What Is Recommended changes slightly from year to year." Well-worth keeping in mind!)
silveradept: A kodama with a trombone. The trombone is playing music, even though it is held in a rest position (Default)

From: [personal profile] silveradept


He's fine, he's happy, and clearly consuming food at a happy clip. I don't think there's a reason to worry about bottles and formula.
lark_ascends: Blue and purple dragonfly, green background (Default)

From: [personal profile] lark_ascends


I have no help to offer, but sounds like you got a lot of good advice up thread. Instead, I'll just offer *hugs*.
.

Profile

nanila: me (Default)
Mad Scientess
May 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 2025

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags