nanila: (togusa: it's all rubbish)
2020-03-22 09:59 pm

Day 47/183: Weekly goal check-in reassessment

My last goal check-in was almost exactly a month ago. I stopped doing it because I was on holiday but now I reckon the advent of the pandemic has rendered most of the goals irrelevant. For a start, there’s no way for me to go to the gym for the next few months, and no way I’m going to get through this without the liberal application of booze. When examined in the cold light of covid-19, should any of them should be retained?

Individual assessments behind the cut. )

In summary, the only goal I’ll be keeping is the one about reading more than ten books that are new to me. I don’t expect this to be particularly challenging, given that I have at least ten on my bedside table and I won’t be going anywhere for a while. So, sayonara, weekly goal check-in posts. Maybe I’ll give you a whirl in 2021.

nanila: me (Default)
2020-02-23 03:49 pm

Day 29/183: Carmarthenshire photo + Weekly Goal Check-in (8/52)

IMG_9661
Keiki and Humuhumu running up the hill toward Paxton’s Tower in Carmarthenshire, Wales, whilst pretending to be aeroplanes.

Goal Check-in 8/52: Mostly fail )
nanila: (Bush Fire Hazard)
2020-02-16 03:27 pm

Day 26/183: Flooding in Carmarthenshire + Weekly Goal Check-in (7/52)

This was the view over the River Tywi at around mid-day on Saturday. We were up on the hill above it for all of ten minutes and were soaked to the skin when we returned to the cottage. You can see the silvery river snaking through the centre left of the photo.

20200215_110412

This is (almost) the same view 24 hours later. The river hasn't so much burst its banks as engulfed the entire middle section of the valley in a torrent of brown.

20200216_133229

Goal Check-in 7/52: Mixed success )
nanila: me (Default)
2020-02-09 07:06 pm

Day 20/183: Caturday + Weekly Goal Check-in (6/52)

IMG_9637
[Telstar lording it up in the sunshine on our ill-kempt lawn.]

As I predicted last week, there was a downturn in success this week. It was mostly due to the need to devote a lot of the latter half of the week to clearing out rooms in the house that will be demolished imminently.

Goal Check-in 6/52: half and half )
nanila: me (Default)
2020-02-02 09:39 pm

Day 16/183: Weekly Goal Check-in (5/52)

I got through January and didn't fail at every goal! \o/

Goal Check-in 5/52: all success )
nanila: (kusanagi: crack)
2020-01-26 10:04 pm

Day 12/183: Weekly Goal Check-in (4/52)

You know that feeling when you go to book a hotel for a short stay in Reykjavik, and you want to one that is downtown and gives you breakfast in the morning, so you book whatever deal Expedia gives you, and then you discover it is round the corner from a museum, which pleases you, and you look closely at the museum on Google maps, and it turns out to be the penis museum? I do.

Screenshot_20200122-115334_Maps

Goal Check-in 4/52: mostly success )
nanila: me (Default)
2020-01-19 07:30 pm

Day 9/183: Weekly Goal Check-in (3/52)

This was a busy weekend. Amongst other things, we went for a 6.6 km walk through a bog in Leicestershire (see photo).

20200118_160624

Goal Check-in 3/52: mostly success )
nanila: me (Default)
2020-01-05 07:57 pm

Day 3/183: Weekly Goal Check-in (1/52)

I’m going to be putting my weekly goal check-in posts behind a cut and tagging them, so you can easily scroll on by if they don’t interest you.

Goal Check-in 1/52: mostly success )
nanila: (manning: uberbitch)
2015-01-26 02:10 pm

Breastfeeding and Page 3

A casual acquaintance of mine made a post on Facebook that nettled me a bit, but I didn't want to reply to it there fore several reasons. First, I don't know this person well and have no idea how they'd take disagreement. Second, I make it a rule to check Facebook once a week or less. Third, I only use it to like pictures of other people's cats and babies and to make innocuous, supportive and inoffensive comments, because it is a piss-poor platform for nuanced, well-informed interaction. Thus, behold: a journal entry containing the reply I would have made if said comments hadn't been hosted on Facebook.

The post essentially said: Why do feminists think it's okay to be pro-breastfeeding-in-public and simultaneously oppose Page 3 of The Sun newspaper? Are they not contradicting themselves on the subject of bare breasts? (I'm phrasing this more coherently than the original poster did.)

Well. Let us examine the problem with this logic. It assumes that bare breasts are viewed in a manner that is completely context-free. Either they are simply fleshy bits stuck on the front of ladypersons and are totally inoffensive under all circumstances, which is an attitude I would gladly be on board with adopting, or they are totally offensive under all circumstances, which I would not. The social reality is a lot more nuanced than this. If the "feminist" attitude seems contradictory to you, it's because mainstream social attitudes towards these two particular presentations of bare breasts are most frequently contradictory, and often the reverse of what one might expect (e.g. the first is offensive and the second is not). Thus, the answer to the question is that there isn't a contradiction in adopting such attitudes, because the assumption that all mammary presentations are equal in the eyes of society is wrong.

Below lies my personal view on this glandular conundrum:
I identify as a feminist and I find neither of these boob presentations offensive. The first is a no-brainer for me, not least because I'm a breastfeeding mum. Despite what I'd like to believe in theory - that a breast being used to feed a baby is being presented in an entirely innocent way - I feel the immense social pressure to breastfeed in an innocuous manner, and thus I always try to find a discreet place in which to do it and ensure that I'm covered. It would be much easier if I could just whip out a nipple and let baby latch, of course, but I don't really want to be stared at whilst I'm feeding him, so I don't do that. I would be delighted if breastfeeding stopped being such a polarising subject, but until social attitudes change pretty drastically, I don't see it happening.

On the subject of Page 3: I don't think the breasts themselves are offensive. Taking it a step further, I think that the circumstances under which they are photographed and presented are far better than what was being proposed to replace them. The owners of the breasts are compensated (I can't comment upon whether or not the amount of the compensation should be deemed adequate), but most importantly, they have consented to be photographed. The idea that replacing these images with "candid" (i.e. non-consensual) photos of celebrities in states of undress would somehow be a step forward for feminism was baffling to me. Some of the opposition to Page 3 that I've encountered also strikes me as another way to devalue sex work and demean sex workers, which...do we really need more of that?

I know there are those who would ask me, "What if your daughter was on a train and saw a man looking at Page 3?" I can only say that I think it best that she learns that there are images of naked people in the world and that most of the people who view them are wankers.
nanila: little and wicked (mizuno: lil naughty)
2011-04-07 02:35 pm

Why I Loathe Facebook.

I have a lot of reasons to loathe Facebook, like its hideous interface and the way it's killed off usage of interactive longer-form blogging sites. But I particularly resent Facebook for showing up my less admirable qualities.

For instance, I used to pride myself on not being a grudge-holder. My anger is a flash in the pan. It flares up, I rage, say terrible things, go away, sulk for ten minutes and then it's over and I can hardly remember why I was upset in the first place. (Other people usually do, unfortunately.) So I believed myself to be fairly free of the kind of rankling resentment that afflicts many others, and I took pride in that.

Then Facebook came along.

At first it was a bit of fun on the side. I'd log on furtively for a couple of minutes a week and delight in discovering long-lost friends and relatives, exchange a few personal catch-up messages and go away feeling pleased, if slightly guilty for being unfaithful to LiveJournal.

Like all bits of fun on the side, it got complicated. People from high school that I didn't remember started sending me friend requests. I hemmed and hawed over these, dithered over pressing "Accept" or "Ignore" and let the requests go stale. Every time I logged in, there they were, staring at me like puppies waiting outside in a rainstorm.

That was bad enough. It showed me to be incapable of taking action on something that might hurt someone's feelings, even though inaction pretty much sent the same message.

The crux came when two people I distinctly remembered sent me friend requests. I learned that I am, indeed, capable of holding a grudge for a very long time. The first person had been after my high school boyfriend before he and I started dating. She was never overtly nasty to me, but you know how you can tell when someone who's being smilingly polite to you is actually imagining your head on a pike? Yeah, it was like that. Why she thought, "I'll add her!", when she saw my name on Facebook I shall never understand. We were scarcely even acquaintances then.

The second person - oh, the second person. When I left high school for university a year early, she made a big song and dance about staying in touch. I wrote her several letters. She sent none. What she did do, however, was show my letters to my erstwhile boyfriend. There was nothing incriminating in them, but they were written in confidence, and to me, that confidence is sacred. I do not read other people's mail, electronic or otherwise, and I treat the contents of letters that are addressed to me alone as exactly that. I was furious when I found out. That alone would have been enough motivation to cut her off for a good long spell (and I would certainly never trust that person beyond acquaintance level again). However, when I returned home for the summer, the person in question declined to speak to me because, "I had turned into a druggie." Leaving aside the laughability of that statement, fifteen years later I still can't tolerate someone who had broken confidence. Did she think that clicking "Add Friend" on Facebook somehow meant, "I'm sorry. Let's forget about past wrongs and start afresh now that we're older"? Because that so didn't work for me.

I had no problem clicking "Ignore" with all the petty, vindictive, grudge-holding spirit I could muster. And that's why I hate Facebook.