nanila: little and wicked (mizuno: lil naughty)
Mad Scientess ([personal profile] nanila) wrote2016-04-01 01:56 pm

Friday's Unscientific Poll: Important Bacon Question

Poll #17390 Important bacon question
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 52


I prefer

View Answers

thin-cut/streaky/American-style bacon
21 (41.2%)

thick-cut/back/British/Canadian-style bacon
21 (41.2%)

not to eat bacon
9 (17.6%)

If you eat bacon, do you prefer it

View Answers

crispy
26 (57.8%)

chewy
19 (42.2%)

If you eat bacon, do you prefer it

View Answers

smoked
29 (69.0%)

unsmoked
13 (31.0%)

For those who eat bacon: Here is a food that is *not* improved by the addition of bacon:



Today's Unscientific Poll was prompted by the realisation that after all these years in Britain, I still (not-so-)secretly prefer thin, crispy, streaky bacon to the thick-cut back bacon that gets served with a full English.
chickenfeet: (Default)

[personal profile] chickenfeet 2016-04-02 03:29 pm (UTC)(link)
My bacon purveyor; a Mennonite family who produce their own products from their own pigs, offer three types of bacon, all smoked. They do back and side bacon which pretty much approximate to the British and American standards, though of a very high quality. They also do shoulder bacon which is like a mix of the two; a sort of marbled back bacon. It's my preference and, weirdly, it's the cheapest of the three. Note, my comment here refers specifically to bacon eaten as part of a fry up. For other culinary purposes I have different preferences. And let's not forget peameal bacon; Canada's distinctive contribution to the non-smakoed bacon genre.